Today is about Noah.
I think its about time people had a fair idea about the truth about the man, instead of some magical, or mystical idea that he somehow managed to do some impossible things.
Extraordinary is one thing.
Impossible is quite another.
So we'll start off with a bit of his history, because all things start somewhere, and its important to put him in the right setting.
The Bible is not a book of all things.
It is not.
It does not contain all wisdoms, or every story, a big book though it may be.
The Bible is a book of the lineage of kings and righteous men in Gods sight. Running backward from Jesus to Adam. Somewhere along that line was a man named Noah, who was one of the five most important men in the whole of Judaism, Christianity and Islam.
Noah was born an albino, with the purest of white skin like snow and eyes of red, burning like fire. He was the son of Lamech, grandson of Methuselah (the oldest man who ever lived) and the great grandson of Enoch. Apon his birth he brought fear to the family because to Methuselah, he had the appearance of an angel. Methuselah went to the ends of the earth to find and consult his father, Enoch, who taught him that Noah - who Enoch named - had been blessed by God when given this appearance and would be a great man, but also predicted that it would be in the days of his great grandson Noah, the the days of the world would come to an end.
Now Noah grew old, and a time came when God just about looked at the people of the world as filth but for a few. He sent Noah to his local city to send warning of imminant danger if they did not change their ways, just as He always did.
And as usual, or at least for the most part, the people he warned shunned him. After three times of trying, God had enough, and told Noah to build the ark.
Now there are two accounts of Noah in religion, one from the book of Genesis and one from the book of recitation - otherwise known as the Qu'ran.
They both agree almost perfectly with eachother but for one point.
Genesis tells us the flood was world wide, while the Qu'ran tells us the event was for the people of Noah.
There is only one way in which both books are true.
Noah built the ark for the world wide event, but for the purposes of only his people and his region.
There is archeological evidence to support this idea.
There was a tablet found a few years ago in South America, telling of a story almost identical to Noah, except the name. India too has such a character in Hinduism named Manu, who was saved by Vishnu.
Now its not my idea that Noah went everywhere in the world collecting animals, a pair of each and 7 pairs of clean animals, and did that before the rains.
That just doesn't make sense.
It might have been possible to an extent if water was everywhere, but how would he have managed to pick up animals so far inland?
No, it didn't happen.
We all know it doesn't make sense whether we choose to defend it or not.
But, it is entirely possible, that since the Bible is a book of a line of Kings, a branch of the world family tree, that the Bible only tells of the man in that branch that dealt with their flood, while other places in the rest of the world dealt with their own respective parts of the great flood.
This idea is the only explaination that allows archeological, Biblical and Islamic views to all be true and correct.
Its then my view that this is the reality of Noah and the flood.
So even though we've now sorted what Noah did we should sort out what his boat could have done, and when we do, we can see it would take a miracle, or magic for a ship that, in modern day terms, was only 450 feet/135 meters long, 75 feet/22.5 meters wide, and 45 feet/13.5 meters high to carry such a vast number, and variety of animals from around the globe.
Big boat. But not anywhere big enough.
It is big enough though, to take a pair of every animal from Noahs region, instead of the world like I've already suggested.
Easily big enough.
But, and here's the thing, where did all the water come from?
Well, I have a theory.
And I dont think its a bad one, if I do say so myself.
See there are a few really weird things about the world pre 5000 years ago.
Which is strange really, because thats when the Bible tells us that Noahs flood was. There or there abouts. But I dont think that thats when the flood was.
I think that it happened before 5000 years ago.
I think that many things were forgotten, and destroyed. Great civilisations and knowledge all gone in the Great Flood. The best evidence we have for this is the Ancient Egyptians pre-history, and the age old city of Atlantis that is long long gone.
The fact is we dont know anything about any of it.
What we do know is that the pre-history Egyptians had electricity. We also know that it was them that built the pyramids and the sphynx, both dated by the stars at about 12,500 years ago.
My theory is that somewhere between 5000 and 12,500 years ago, the world was flooded for a short period.
It just so happens that about 10,000 years ago the world came quite suddenly out of an Ice Age.
The ice from this Ice Age had reached around about the 40th parallel, both north and south.
Right now, its sitting about the 70th parallel noroth and south.
Hell of a lot of ice turned to water in that time.
Hell of a lot of water that's got to go somewhere.
Hell of a rise in the sea levels, and a hell of a lot of river-side and coastal towns and cities that just got flooded.
Considering the proximity of the pyramids and the sphynx to the nile, its quite likely that the sphynx was in the river itself after it burst its banks.
Here's a picture of the sphynx:

Here's a picture of a rock outcrop eroded by water.

Seems obvious enough.
And like I said, many people would have died.
Virtually everyone in those times lived on rivers or coasts, in fact thats pretty much the same today, except today we have means of fleeing.
So Noah took the animals. A pair of each, with 7 pairs of clean animals.
His ark was big enough for his local job.
Everyone in his city would have died.
And so the story of the Bible and Qu'ran is explained.
All except his ship.
Where is it?
Well...
Lets have a look at what Genesis says.
"But God remembered Noah, the waters receded, and the Ark came to rest on the mountains of Ararat."
Noahs ark is on the mountains of Ararat.
Thats a mountain range.
Not a mountain.
In the whole of Genesis chapters 5-9 where Noahs story is told, at no point does it say that Noahs ark landed on the top of a mountain.
It says the ark landed nn a mountain range.
A valley is part of a mountain range.
And the impossible amount of water that would have had to seeped out of the earth to put the ark on top of mount ararat would have placed it on a spot where there are only 47 higher places.
Whereas if the ark had landed in the valley of the Ararat mountain range, the ark would have landed on a spot 3,600m, or more than 2 miles closer to sea-level, on the edge of a flat plane, near the flooded river Morat in Turkey.
The enormous flat plain around the mountains would have ensured that before the water totally disappeared, there would have been a very far view from Noahs ark, of nothing but water.

Maybe I'm wrong.
But I really dont think I am.